PLF Logo Home >> Casey's Class Action
Banner
general
general
Attorneys
Locations
Contact Us
general
general


Casey's Class Action

On May 30, 2007, named Plaintiffs Kristina Jones and Kimberly Marrs filed a lawsuit against Defendant Casey’s General Stores ("CGS") seeking to recover unpaid overtime on behalf of all CGS Assistant Managers who worked in excess of 40 hours per week. The lawsuit charges that CGS violated federal law by deliberately failing to keep accurate time records and failing to pay overtime wages as required by the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”).


Plaintiffs allege that this lawsuit applies to thousands of assistant managers employed by CGS across the United States. Plaintiffs bring this action on behalf of themselves and all other current and former employees who were designated, paid or employed as Assistant Managers in the United States from May 30, 2004 to the present.


Under the FLSA, employees are entitled to time-and-a-half pay for each hour over 40 hours worked in a workweek, unless they are exempt from the Act. The FLSA also requires employers to maintain accurate records of hours actually worked by its employees.


In this case, Plaintiffs allege that CGS used a “schedule-based” time keeping system that did not account for all hours worked by assistant managers. Specifically, Plaintiffs allege that they and other similarly-situated assistant managers worked unpaid overtime off-the-clock for CGS.

Casey's denies the allegations.

If you are currently employed, or have been employed in the past three years, by CGS as an Assistant Manager, and would like more information concerning your legal rights, we encourage you to contact an attorney.

Forms:
  Opt-In Consent Form (Asst. Manager)
  Opt-In Consent Form (Cook/Cashier)
   
Orders:
  Order Re Notice and Conditional Certification
   
Other Resources:
  www.caseysovertimelawsuit.com
     
 
Base Bar
Copyright © 2008 Peters Law Firm, P.C.
1-888-840-3157
The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. This disclosure is required.

A description or indication of limitation of practice does not mean that any agency or board has certified such lawyer as a specialist or expert in an indicated field of law practice, nor does it mean that such lawyer is necessarily any more expert or competent than any other lawyer. All potential clients are urged to make thier own independent investigation and evaluation of any lawyer being considered. This notice is required.